I am a PhD student at the Erasmus School of Economics in Rotterdam and the Tinbergen Institute. I work under the supervision of Agnieszka Markiewicz and Eric Bartelsman.
In spring 2026, I visited Sciences Po, hosted by Pierre Cahuc.
I am on the 2026–27 economics job market. CV
References: Agnieszka Markiewicz (a.p.markiewicz@uu.nl), Eric Bartelsman (e.j.bartelsman@vu.nl)
Research interests: firm dynamics, labour economics, macroeconomics.
Email: weder "at" ese.eur.nl
The Early-Career Consequences of Digital Technologies (JMP)
Abstract: This paper shows that the rise of digital technologies has shifted relative labour demand from entry-level to experienced workers in recent decades. Dutch administrative data for 2006-2024 reveal a decline in entry into employment after schooling and a concurrent increase in the wage returns to experience. Following large, lumpy investments in digital technologies, such as software and databases, firms reduce their early-career employment share by 13% and pay a 17% higher wage premium for experience. The results are consistent with these technologies enabling firms to codify their routines and knowledge, thereby substituting for entry-level workers and augmenting experienced workers. In a heterogeneous-firm model that embeds this mechanism, the decrease in the investment price of digital technologies accounts for 72% of the decline in entry and 33% of the increase in the returns to experience. Substitution, rather than augmentation, is the dominant channel.
Selected for the IZA@LISER Summer School in Labour Economics (2026)
Presented: Sciences Po Labour Economics Reading Group; Le Mans GAINS Seminar; Erasmus University Rotterdam PhD Seminar; IZA@LISER Summer School; ESPE
Firms and the Wage Penalty of Temporary Work (with Ana Figueiredo and Agnieszka Markiewicz) [PDF] Submitted
Abstract: We decompose the wage penalty of temporary work using matched employer--employee data from the Netherlands. Temporary workers earn 28 log points less per hour than permanent workers. Worker fixed effects explain half of this gap, while firm pay premia account for 28%. We find that most of the firm contribution reflects temporary workers sorting into low-paying firms rather than within-firm pay differences. As temporary employment differs substantially across demographic groups, we extend our framework to gender and native-migrant wage gaps, separating contract from firm sorting. Accounting for contract type explains part of the native-migrant firm pay-premia gap, but matters little for the gender wage gap.
Presented: Torino LABORatorio R. Revelli Workshop; Richmond Fed (CORE Week; co-author); 1st Aarhus Workshop on Labor Markets (co-author); Maastricht University (co-author); Scottish Economics Society; University of Amsterdam MInt Seminar; Spatial, International, and Macro Seminar Erasmus University Rotterdam; EALE
The Macroeconomic Effects of Revenue-Neutral Corporate Tax Reforms (with Riccardo Silvestrini) [PDF] Submitted
Abstract: We study how revenue-neutral corporate tax reforms affect aggregate investment, productivity, and welfare in a heterogeneous firm model. Along the revenue-neutral schedule of rates and deductions, we show that a high-rate, high-deduction regime generates more aggregate investment and higher welfare than a low-rate, low-deduction one. More generous deductions act as an investment subsidy that benefits small to medium-large firms, which invest intensively relative to their size, and thereby foster capital accumulation despite the higher tax rate. However, the same mechanism reallocates capital away from the largest and most productive firms, reducing aggregate productivity. An event study exploiting firm-level variation in exposure to a 2005–2007 Dutch reform supports our model’s key mechanism.
Presented: Theories and Methods in Macroeconomics; Dutch National Bank XAmsterdam Macro Workshop; 5th Sailing the Macro Workshop Ortygia (co-author); University of Naples Federico II (co-author); 7th Annual CefES Conference (co-author)
Reallocation and the Declining Labour Share
Abstract: The U.S. aggregate labour share of income has declined significantly since the mid-1980s. The prevailing view in the literature attributes the decline to common, within-sector decreases in labour shares, thereby downplaying the contribution of sectoral reallocation. Using a new decomposition method, I show i) the long-term decline is overwhelmingly driven by sectors whose labour shares fell as they grew in size, ii) reallocation toward high-labour-share sectors would have offset nearly half of the total decrease, an order of magnitude more than previously found; iii) the within-sector effect is only half as large as other studies conclude, no larger than normal fluctuations over the business cycle.
Presented: Erasmus University Rotterdam Brown Bag Seminar; Erasmus University Rotterdam PhD Seminar